MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

16: INCREASED CARBOHYDRATE INTAKE IS ASSOCIATED WITH SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE BURNS

2023· article· en· W4389743441 on OpenAlexaff
Beth Shields, Leopoldo C. Cancio, Kaitlin A Pruskowski, Daren K. Heyland

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Canadian institutionsKingston General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: There is some limited data from randomized controlled trials (RCT) that indicate higher carbohydrate, lower fat intake may reduce the incidence of pneumonia for patients with severe burns. Our study is a post-hoc analysis of a large RCT which evaluated glutamine for adults with severe burns. We sought to evaluate the association between macronutrient intake and mortality and long-term outcomes in these subjects. Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of RE-ENERGIZE, which was a multicenter, international, randomized trial that enrolled 1200 subjects, evaluating glutamine versus an isocaloric control (maltodextrin). Adults with ≥10-20% total body surface area (TBSA) burns requiring skin grafting were included and both short and long-term outcomes were collected. The research protocol for the post-hoc analysis was approved by our Research Regulatory Compliance Division. The resting energy expenditure (REE) was estimated for this analysis using the Milner equation. We included subjects who had 12 full days of nutrition information for this analysis. The average daily macronutrient intake was divided by the REE to determine the %REE achieved. Results: There were 252 subjects from 45 burn centers who met the inclusion criteria as follows: median of 46 years of age (IQR: 31-59) with 35% TBSA burn (IQR: 26-46). The Milner equation REE was 2618 kcal/day (IQR: 2301-2930), and overall subjects achieved a median of 88% REE (IQR: 75-107) during the first 12 hospital days. There was a significant difference in the carbohydrate % REE between those who lived versus those who died [35% (IQR: 28-45) versus 31% (IQR: 25-38), respectively, p=0.045], but no difference in the fat or protein intake. Multiple logistic regression (which adjusted for age and burn size) found for every 1% increase in carbohydrate % REE over the first 12 hospital days, the odds ratio for survival increased by 3.8%. Higher carbohydrate (% REE) was also found to be associated with improved general health perceptions (p=0.005, R2=0.07) and improved vitality (p=0.040, R2=0.04) at 6 months. Conclusions: In summary, higher carbohydrate intake during the first 12 days of hospitalization was associated with survival and may also be associated with improved long-term outcomes for patients with severe burns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care Medicine→Same topicClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology→French-language works237,207→