MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389748807 · doi:10.5267/j.esm.2023.10.003

A new framework for optimizing energy harvesting from smart composites integrated with piezoelectric patches utilizing lamination parameters

2023· article· en· W4389748807 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mustafa Kemal Acar, Peyman Lahe Motlagh

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Solid Mechanics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaminationFinite element methodPiezoelectricityEnergy harvestingHeaviside step functionVibrationMaterials sciencePiezoelectric sensorUnimorphAcousticsEnergy (signal processing)Structural engineeringComposite materialEngineeringMathematicsPhysicsLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amongst various structures, 2D panels are widely used in many industries and in each application, there are many ambient vibrations which can be converted into electrical energy. The very efficient method to utilize can be using piezoelectric patches which are stuffiest enough for various applications like energy harvesting. This study presents a novel approach for investigating energy harvesting in smart structures using composite panels integrated with piezoelectric patches. The panels are chosen to symmetry-balanced laminated composites, and modal and harmonic analysis conducted using the Rayleigh-Ritz method. To compute the kinetic and potential energy components of the piezoelectric patches at a local level, piecewise Heaviside functions are employed, and these energy components are integrated into the equations of motion together with those of the host composite plate. The results of the numerical method are validated by a commercial finite element software (FEM) COMSOL and there is a good match between FEM and this paper results. By subjecting the laminated composite with piezoelectric patches to forced vibration while varying the lamination parameter, the power output is optimized. The findings emphasize the substantial impact of the lamination parameter on power output, indicating that modifications can result in significant power output increase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering Solid MechanicsSame topicInnovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207