MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389753014 · doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2023.171606

Design and testing of a hybrid electromagnetic damping device for automotive applications

2023· article· en· W4389753014 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersQingdao University of Science and TechnologyQatar University
KeywordsEddy currentConductorDamperEddy current brakeElectrical conductorMagnetic fieldDragMechanicsMagnetic dampingMaterials scienceMagnetic circuitExcitationAcousticsMechanical engineeringPhysicsElectrical engineeringVibrationStructural engineeringEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study proposes a new design concept for combining a viscous fluid damper (VFD) with an eddy current damper (ECD). Three main concepts were thoroughly discussed: the magnetic system, the conductive material, and the housing. In particular, the excitation circuit and magnetic field were applied from the exterior of the main chamber of the VFD to minimize the intrusive risks introduced into the damper when trying to connect an internal magnetic system to an external power source. Experimental investigations on a test rig developed for this purpose were carried out in this work. The design aimed to generate eddy currents in an oscillating cylinder made of copper placed around an existing real-world car damper and secured to its moving rod. When exposed to an electromagnetic field, the newly designed system rapidly generated an extra level of damping in addition to the initial damping effect provided by the viscous mechanism. The obtained results showed that applying an electric current of only 1A increased the amplitude of the drag force by 12 % for an electrode with a thickness of 1.5 mm. A magnetic saturation phenomenon resisted any extra increase in the current. Making the metal conductor thicker is expected to increase the volume of the conductor in which the currents are flowing and, consequently, increase the damping effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it