MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

S26 Clinical Practice Experience With Subcutaneous Vedolizumab for the Treatment of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease

2023· article· en· W4389766311 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kirk Russ, Abigail M. Wojtowicz, Lisa Young, Anita Afzali

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVedolizumabMedicineUlcerative colitisCrohn's diseaseDiseaseInternal medicineGastroenterologyDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Vedolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits α4β7 integrin. Intravenous (IV) vedolizumab is approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in over 60 countries. An additional subcutaneous (SC) formulation has been approved as a maintenance therapy in Australia, Canada, and Europe. We conducted a literature review to identify publications reporting use of SC vedolizumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in clinical practice. Methods: Literature searches were conducted on September 4, 2023, to identify articles (PubMed) and congress abstracts (Embase) on SC vedolizumab published from 2019 to present. Results: Results were screened for relevant publications containing data on patients treated in clinical practice. Data were extracted on baseline characteristics, effectiveness, safety, and treatment patterns, including SC dose escalation and switching back from SC to IV vedolizumab. Results In total, 95 publications were identified. After screening, data were extracted from 21 eligible publications (9 congress abstracts; 12 articles). Overall, the publications included 2,730 patients who met the study eligibility criteria, of whom 2,047 patients with IBD (CD, 726; UC, 1,009; IBD – unspecified, 312) received SC vedolizumab in clinical practice. Previous exposure to other biologics ranged from 42.9% to 100% of patients at baseline in 9 publications. In five studies, a proportion of patients (14–43.7%) initiated SC vedolizumab after IV induction, whereas in ten studies, patients who switched to SC vedolizumab did so during maintenance. Regarding the dose of SC vedolizumab, three publications reported the use of vedolizumab 108 mg SC every 2 weeks regardless of the previous IV dosing schedule, while in one study, the SC dosing interval used depended on the IV dosing interval. The SC dosing interval was reduced in two studies from 2 to 1.5 weeks in two patients (1.5%) and from 2 weeks to weekly in nine patients (10.1%), of whom three received an escalated dose of vedolizumab IV prior to switching. After switching from IV to SC vedolizumab: four publications reported improvements or no differences in disease activity scores compared with baseline scores; five reported clinical remission in 58–92% of patients or that clinical remission remained stable from baseline; two publications reported corticosteroid-free remission in 39.4–68.2% of patients; two reported biochemical remission in 42.0–59.3% of patients. Six publications reported that patients were satisfied with SC vedolizumab treatment after switching. Five publications specified that injection-site reactions were the most common adverse event. The proportion of patients who switched back from SC to IV vedolizumab was 3.2–10% in six studies and 37.5% in one study. Reported reasons for switching back included adverse events, fear of needles, and patient preference. Two publications reported that 10 patients experienced an adverse event after switching back to IV, of whom five discontinued vedolizumab. Conclusions: SC vedolizumab is a well-tolerated, effective treatment for the maintenance of clinical remission in patients with CD and UC treated in clinical practice. Only a small proportion of patients underwent SC dose escalation or switched back to IV administration, although data are limited for these outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.048
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.048
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→