MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389766750 · doi:10.4138/atlgeo.2023.011

Atlantic Universities Geoscience Conference Abstracts: 73rd Annual Conference, October 19–21, 2023

2023· article· en· W4389766750 on OpenAlexaffabout
The Editors

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantic Geoscience · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeotourism and Geoheritage Conservation
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Lac Cinquante uranium deposit located in the western Churchill Province of Nunavut is currently characterized as a vein-type uranium deposit consisting of uranium mineralization concentrated in fractures, shear zones, and stockworks.The deposit is hosted by Archean basement rocks overlain by Proterozoic sedimentary and volcanic strata of the Baker Lake Group.The source of uranium in the Lac Cinquante deposit is unknown.We hypothesize that the uranium was either (1) leached and transported in hydrothermal basinal fluids through faults and fractures in the underlying Hudson and/or Nueltin Granitic Suite where it became deposited in the Baker Lake Basin, or (2) sourced from the host Baker Lake Group and the granitoid rocks provided the heat to drive the hydrothermal system that leached and precipitated uranium.Preliminary results after XRF analysis and petrographic study show zirconium to be associated with uranium mineralization, which may indicate high field strength element mobility in the hydrothermal fluids that circulated throughout the system.Furthermore, the XRF data shows evidence of two distinct mineralization events, one hosted in a calcite matrix, and the second disseminated in an albitic plagioclase matrix.These findings suggest that the deposit is characterized by hydrothermal uranium as well as vein-type mineralization.Future work will aim to resolve the timing of discrete mineralization events by U-Pb dating to produce a paragenetic sequence.Trace element analysis will be used to deduce the source of uranium for this deposit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtlantic GeoscienceSame topicGeotourism and Geoheritage ConservationFrench-language works237,207