Exploring the Moho beneath the Northern Canadian Cordillera, with seismically constrained gravity inversion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The geometry and depth of the Moho beneath the Northern Canadian Cordillera and adjacent North American craton are modeled through the application of both cokriging and 3-D inversion of gravity data, integrated with sparse seismic depth estimates. Models require a regional density correction, with lower densities beneath the Cordillera than the craton. The lower densities are primarily attributed to a reduction in upper mantle density, ascribed to thermal expansion under regionally higher temperatures. The eastern margin of this low-density zone is broadly aligned with the rapid westward shallowing of the lithospheric–asthenospheric boundary. From the Cordillera to the North American craton, the Moho is broadly flat at a depth of ∼32 km. A zone of deeper Moho (up to ∼38 km) beneath the Mistry Creek embayment has a modeled mantle density that is of a colder cratonic signature, akin to the Mackenzie craton, and is interpreted to represent the preserved remnants of an old rift basin that is a local focus of the diffuse seismicity. Southeast of the Fort Norman structure, seismicity is broadly focused along the eastern edge of the low-density zone. Major structures such as the Denali and Tintina faults, with 100’s km of right-lateral displacement, separate zones of higher and lower upper mantle density, supporting the interpretation of their continuation into the upper mantle. Within the North American craton, upper mantle density steadily increases toward the Great Bear magmatic zone but increases more rapidly beneath the Slave craton in tangent with a deepening of the Moho.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".