MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389780122 · doi:10.1101/2023.12.14.23299857

Profile of tetralogy of Fallot at the cardiology clinic of Saint-Damien hospital from January 2019 to December 2021

2023· preprint· en· W4389780122 on OpenAlexaff
Naïka Paulemie Désir, Adonaï Aly Isaac Julien, R.F. Alexandre, Joanne Fevry, Taïna Brice, Alexandra Noisette

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTetralogy of FallotStenosisInternal medicineEpidemiologyCardiologyRetrospective cohort studyHeart murmurTetralogyCohortMortality ratePediatricsHeart disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective Our work aimed to study the epidemiological and clinical aspects of Tetralogy of Fallot (TF) in the cardiology unit of the Saint-Damien Nos Petits Frères et Sœurs hospital in Haiti. Methodology This is a retrospective study of patients aged 0 to 18 years with Tetralogy of Fallot confirmed by echocardiography. Data were entered using an elaborated form and analyzed with Epi Info software version 7.2.2.16 and Microsoft Excel 2013. Results From January 2019 to December 2021, we identified 102 patients aged 0 to 18 years with TF. A male predominance was noted with a sex ratio M/F of 1.55. The average age of discovery of our cohort was 3 years and 7 months [0-16 years; standard deviation: 9.9]. The clinical signs were dominated by a systolic murmur (91.18%) followed by cyanosis (39.22%) and dyspnea (33.33%). On echocardiography, the regular form (76.47%) associated with the severe stenosis (83.33%) was remarkable. 20.59% of patients were able to benefit from surgery and the mortality rate was 14.94%. Patients were presenting at an advanced stage where they mostly needed surgical treatment to survive. Conclusion This study shows that the prevalence of TF is also high in developing countries. The heart murmur at the pulmonary focus and the cyanosis were more present on physical examination. Patients were presenting at an advanced stage where they mostly needed surgical treatment to survive. Preventive measures are needed to reduce the mortality rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→