3‐D geophysical modeling of a buried, simple impact crater: Holleford impact structure, Ontario, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Holleford Crater is a deeply buried, 2.35 km diameter late Proterozoic‐early Cambrian (550 ± 50 Ma) simple impact crater located in southeastern Ontario, Canada. Exploration drilling in the 1950–60s indicated a >450 m deep, simple impact structure with an infill stratigraphy of Cambro‐Ordovician clastic and carbonate sediments and a −2.2 mGal gravity anomaly. We conducted new ground‐based geophysical surveys (magnetics, gravity) and potential field modeling to better resolve the buried impact structure depth, subsurface geometry, and postimpact modification. Geophysical surveys reveal a well‐defined ~3 mGal Bouguer gravity low and <20 nT residual magnetic anomaly over the crater basin. The lack of a well‐defined magnetic anomaly is due to the low magnetic contrast between Mesoproterozoic metasedimentary target rocks and Paleozoic infill sediments. The modeled basement surface shows a deeply buried (>400 m), eroded simple impact structure with a rim‐to‐rim diameter ( D ) of 1.8–2 km, a residual rim height of about 30 m and a true depth ( d t ) >400 m. The modeled diameter is smaller than the previous estimate (2.35 km) based on the surface outcrop pattern of Paleozoic strata, which overestimates the buried impact structure dimensions. The modeled basement surface identifies a rim breach and a possible fluvial outflow channel in the southeast impact structure rim. The channel is up to 150 m deep and 400 m in width and has morphology similar to outlet channels produced by fluvial rim dissection of terrestrial impact structures and “tadpole craters” on Mars.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".