MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389783163 · doi:10.54033/cadpedv20n9-025

Homeless people: an analysis of public policies implemented by the Government of the Federal District (GDF)

2023· article· en· W4389783163 on OpenAlexaff
Eduardo Dias Leite, Angélica Ferreira Santos, Raimundo Otávio Nogueira Dias

Bibliographic record

VenueCaderno Pedagógico · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGovernance, Compliance, and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeclarationGovernment (linguistics)PopulationUnemploymentPublic administrationConstitutionEconomic growthPolitical scienceBusinessLawEconomicsEnvironmental healthMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article seeks to analyze the public policies implemented by the Government of the Federal District (GDF), aimed at the homeless population. Despite the recognition of the fundamental nature of social rights by the 1988 Federal Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, such acts still need concrete measures to materialize their provisions. To carry it out, the descriptive research method and secondary data obtained by the Federal District Planning Company (CODEPLAN) in 2022 were used, which outlined the profile of the homeless population in the Federal District. The difficulty in implementing public policies in the Federal District is also reported. The research showed that the coronavirus pandemic contributed to the increase in the homeless population and that unemployment was identified as the main cause. These people are looking for an alternative to obtain income and have become victims of urban and police violence and social discrimination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCaderno PedagógicoSame topicGovernance, Compliance, and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207