Examining Apical or Basolateral Protein Localization in<i>Aedes aegypti</i>Tissues: Cross-Section Immunohistochemistry
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is an important technique that permits visualization of cellular components and for determining the presence and/or distribution of proteins or other macromolecules in tissue samples. Normally, IHC involves the detection of epitopes using an antigen-specific primary antibody and a secondary antibody coupled with a reporter molecule or fluorophore that can bind to the primary antibody, allowing for the spatial distribution of a protein of interest to be detected. Although normally IHC does not provide quantitative results compared to techniques such as enzyme-linked immunoassay or western blotting, it permits the localization, expression mapping, and distribution of target proteins in intact tissues. Here, we describe an IHC protocol for examining apical versus basolateral protein staining through sectioning tissue samples from fixed, embedded tissues (e.g., IHC-paraffin) and adding primary antibodies against a target protein. This IHC protocol provides a guide for tissue fixation, sectioning, and staining of tissue samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it