Highly Reversible Lithiation of Additive Free T‐Nb<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> for a Quarter of a Million Cycles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Fast energy storage via intercalation requires quick ionic diffusion and often results in pseudocapacitive behavior. The cycling stability of such energy storage materials remains understudied despite the relevance to lifetime cost. Orthorhombic niobium oxide (T‐Nb 2 O 5 ) is a rapid ion intercalation material with a theoretical capacity of 201.7 mAh g −1 (Li 2 Nb 2 O 5 ) and good cycling stability due to the minimal unit cell strain during (de)intercalation. Prior reports of T‐Nb 2 O 5 cycling between 1.3–3.1 V versus Li/Li + noted a 50% loss in capacity after 10 000 cycles. Here, cyclic voltammetry is used to identify the role of the voltage window, state of charge, and potentiostatic holds on the cycling stability of mesoporous T‐Nb 2 O 5 thin films. Films cycled between 1.2–3.0 V versus Li/Li + without voltage holds (Li 1.1 Nb 2 O 5 ) exhibited extreme cycling stability with 90.8% capacity retention after 0.25 million cycles without detectable morphological/crystallographic changes. In contrast, the inclusion of 60 s voltage holds (Li 2.18 Nb 2 O 5 ) led to rapid capacity loss with 61.6% retention after 10 000 cycles with corresponding X‐ray diffraction evidence of amorphization. Cycling with other limited voltage windows identifies that most crystallographic degradation occurs at higher extents of lithiation. These results reveal remarkable stability over limited conditions and suggest that T‐Nb 2 O 5 amorphization is associated with high extents of lithiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".