Relationship of irisin with disease severity and dopamine uptake in Parkinson's disease patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to investigate the relationship of irisin with the severity of Parkinson's disease (PD) and dopamine (DOPA) uptake in patients with PD and to understand the role of irisin in PD. METHODS: The plasma levels of irisin and α-syn were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Motor and nonmotor symptoms were assessed with the relevant scales. DOPA uptake was measured with DOPA positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: The plasma levels of α-syn and irisin in patients with PD gradually increased and decreased, respectively, with the progression of the disease. There was a negative correlation between plasma α-syn and irisin levels in patients with PD. The level of irisin in plasma was negatively correlated with Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-III scores and positively correlated with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. The striatal/occipital lobe uptake ratios (SORs) of the ipsilateral and contralateral caudate nucleus and anterior and posterior putamen in the high-irisin group were significantly higher than those in the low-irisin group, and irisin levels in the caudate nucleus and anterior and posterior putamen contralateral to the affected limb were lower than those on the ipsilateral side. The level of irisin was positively correlated with the SORs of the ipsilateral and contralateral caudate nucleus and putamen in PD patients. CONCLUSIONS: Irisin plays a neuroprotective role by decreasing the level of α-syn. Irisin is negatively correlated with the severity of motor symptoms and cognitive impairment. More importantly, irisin can improve DOPA uptake in the striatum of patients with PD, especially on the side contralateral to the affected limb.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".