Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing of Mo and TZM Exoskeleton with Cu Infiltration for New Heat Sinks Configuration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study reports the fabrication and characterization of molybdenum (Mo) metal and titanium‐zirconium‐molybdenum (TZM) alloy exoskeletons with honeycomb cavity structures (HCS) that are infiltrated with oxygen‐free high conductivity (OFHC) Cu under an inert atmosphere as a potential replacement for Cu‐Mo‐Cu laminate in heat sink applications for power electronics semiconductors like GaAs. The thermal expansion behavior and the thermal loading of the starting Mo and TZM structures, and of the Cu‐infiltrated parts are evaluated. The fabricated Mo and TZM structures with density >99% and Mo‐based heat sinks with improved CTE (6.6 × 10 −6 K −1 ) when compared to conventional Cu‐Mo‐Cu laminated heat sinks (CTE = 7.6 × 10 −6 K −1 ). The new Mo and TZM structures promise superior performance due to their closer CTE to that of GaAs and similar semiconductors (CTE = 5.7 × 10 −6 K −1 ). Exposure to temperatures up to 1073 K did not affect the Mo microstructure due to the inherent resistance to recrystallization, while exposure to 1373 K did reduce hardness. In contrast, TZM exoskeletons showed resistance to recrystallization even at 1373 K. The fabricated composite heat sinks showed thermal diffusivity (≈61 × 10 6 m 2 s −1 ) that is within the upper limits of those reported for commercial laminated heat sinks (45 to 65 × 10 6 m 2 s −1 ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it