Zoish: A Novel Feature Selection Approach Leveraging Shapley Additive Values for Machine Learning Applications in Healthcare
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the intricate landscape of healthcare analytics, effective feature selection is a prerequisite for generating robust predictive models, especially given the common challenges of sample sizes and potential biases. Zoish uniquely addresses these issues by employing Shapley additive values-an idea rooted in cooperative game theory-to enable both transparent and automated feature selection. Unlike existing tools, Zoish is versatile, designed to seamlessly integrate with an array of machine learning libraries including scikit-learn, XGBoost, CatBoost, and imbalanced-learn.The distinct advantage of Zoish lies in its dual algorithmic approach for calculating Shapley values, allowing it to efficiently manage both large and small datasets. This adaptability renders it exceptionally suitable for a wide spectrum of healthcare-related tasks. The tool also places a strong emphasis on interpretability, providing comprehensive visualizations for analyzed features. Its customizable settings offer users fine-grained control over feature selection, thus optimizing for specific predictive objectives.This manuscript elucidates the mathematical framework underpinning Zoish and how it uniquely combines local and global feature selection into a single, streamlined process. To validate Zoish's efficiency and adaptability, we present case studies in breast cancer prediction and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) prediction in Parkinson's disease, along with evaluations on 300 synthetic datasets. These applications underscore Zoish's unparalleled performance in diverse healthcare contexts and against its counterparts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".