Efficacy of enhanced extracorporeal counterpulsation combined with atorvastatin in the treatment of cognitive impairment after stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cerebral apoplexy patients are prone to cognitive impairment, and it is very important to choose appropriate treatment methods to improve their cognitive impairment after stroke. AIM To evaluate the effects of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) in conjunction with atorvastatin on cognitive function, neurotransmitter levels, and the repair of brain tissue damage in patients with cognitive impairment due to stroke. METHODS In this retrospective study, data from 60 patients with poststroke cognitive impairment due to stroke who were treated in our hospital from February 2021 to July 2022 were analyzed and divided into a treatment group (n = 30) and a control group (n = 30) according to the different nursing methods applied. Patients in the treatment group received EECP in addition to atorvastatin, while those in the control group received atorvastatin alone. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and activities of daily living (ADL) scale scores were compared between the two groups. Additionally, the two groups were compared in terms of serum acetylcholine (ACh), acetylcholinesterase (AChE), nitric oxide (NO), endothelin-1 (ET-1), β2-microglobulin (β2-MG), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and visinin-like protein 1 (VILIP-1) in the serum. Blood flow measurements from the anterior cerebral artery (ACA), middle cerebral artery (MCA) and posterior cerebral artery (PCA) were compared between the two groups before and after treatment, and the pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) of each artery were determined. RESULTS MMSE, MoCA, and ADL scores all improved in both groups following treatment, with the study group showing more improvement than the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, there were statistically significant increases in both ACh and NO levels, whereas decreases occurred in AChE, ET-1, β2-MG, VILIP-1, and GFAP, levels and the PI and RI of the left-ACA, right-ACA, left-MCA, right-MCA, left-PCA, and right-PCA. The study group showed greater gains in all metrics than the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION EECP combined with atorvastatin is effective in the treatment of cognitive impairment after stroke and can effectively improve the cognitive function, neurotransmitter levels, and brain tissue damage status of patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".