Chromosome-level genome assembly of the Pacific geoduck <i>Panopea generosa</i> reveals major inter- and intrachromosomal rearrangements and substantial expansion of the copine gene family
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Pacific geoduck Panopea generosa (class Bivalvia, order Adapedonta, family Hiatellidae, genus Panopea) is the largest known burrowing bivalve with considerable commercial value. Pacific geoduck and other geoduck clams play important roles in maintaining ecosystem health for their filter feeding habit and coupling pelagic and benthic processes. Here, we report a high-quality chromosome-level genome assembly of P. generosa to characterize its phylogeny and molecular mechanisms of its life strategies. The assembled P. generosa genome consists of 19 chromosomes with a size of 1.47 Gb, a contig N50 length of 1.6 Mb, and a scaffold N50 length of 73.8 Mb. The BUSCO test of the genome assembly showed 93.0% completeness. Constructed chromosome synteny revealed many occurrences of inter- and intrachromosomal rearrangements between P. generosa and Sinonovacula constricta. Of the 35,034 predicted protein-coding genes, 30,700 (87.6%) could be functionally annotated in public databases, indicating the high quality of genome annotation. Comparison of gene copy numbers of gene families among P. generosa and 11 selected species identified 507 rapidly expanded P. generosa gene families that are functionally enriched in immune and gonad development and may be involved in its complex survival strategies. In particular, genes carrying the copine domains underwent additional duplications in P. generosa, which might be important for neuronal development and immune response. The availability of a fully annotated chromosome-level genome provides a valuable dataset for genetic breeding of P. generosa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".