Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Principia Box Files Kenneth Blackwell (bio) When Bertrand Russell’s papers were taken to London for cataloguing in 1966, some of the containers were very old and worn.They tell us, in part, how he preserved his papers in the years he worked on Principia Mathematica. The original archival crew encountered eight box files, measuring about 260 × 318 mm. Inside, some were ring binders and some used spring clips. Three of the six oldest, covered in red cloth, manufactured variously by B & G and Stone, were labelled (see the illustration) in ink on the spine in Russell’s hand: “Pamphlets | Wissenschaftslehre” (science and theory of knowledge), “Pamphlets | Mengenlehre etc.” (set theory), and “Pamphlets | Principles of Mathematics”. I recall working on them. The pamphlets are listed in B. Feinberg, ed., The Archives of Bertrand Russell (London: Continuum, 1967), pp. 113–31. “Wissenschaftslehre” is repeated there as a heading on p. 125.These pamphlets now appear individually in the McMaster Library catalogue and, in their original groups, in the Russell Archives card catalogue. Lined out are more intriguing labels, again in Russell’s hand. In order in the illustration they are: “Principia Mathematica | Obsolete MS.”, “Principia Mathematica | Rough Draft”, and “MSS on the Contradictions | 1905”. The inclusion of the year suggests retrospective labelling. In the Russell Archives there is a large quantity of rejected Principia manuscripts that are probably identical, at least in part, to the “obsolete” manuscript he had in the box. Some of that quantity might have been “rough draft”. Just what surviving manuscripts are his 1905 work on the contradictions is for Principia scholarship to determine. It is of interest that the topic warranted a box of its own with a definite year. We can only conjecture how many red box files housed Russell’s work on Principia at its peak, but the sight must have been imposing, if not also worrying to the co-author who, when he went for a walk, was “afraid that the house would catch fire and the manuscript get burnt up” (Auto. 1: 152). The labels are catalogued at https://bracers.mcmaster.ca/134009 et seq. [End Page 176] Click for larger view View full resolution [End Page 177] Kenneth Blackwell Russell Research Centre / McMaster U. blackwk@mcmaster.ca Kenneth Blackwell kenneth blackwell, who has a new grandson, is Hon. Russell Archivist, manages bracers and looks for acquisitions for the Russell Archives. He is revising A Bibliography of Bertrand Russell and continues to work on Volumes 24 and 25 of the Collected Papers. Copyright © 2023 Bertrand Russell Research Centre, McMaster University
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.482 | 0.393 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".