MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 13052: Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential Predicts Incident Cardiac Arrhythmias

2023· article· en· W4389945175 on OpenAlexaff
Art Schuermans, Caitlyn Vlasschaert, Victor Nauffal, Md Mesbah Uddin, Tetsushi Nakao, Abhishek Niroula, Marcus D. R. Klarqvist, Lachelle D. Weeks, Amy E. Lin, Seyedmohammad Saadatagah, Kim Lannery, Megan Wong, Whitney Hornsby, Steven A. Lubitz, Christie M. Ballantyne, Siddhartha Jaiswal, Alexander G. Bick, Patrick T. Ellinor, Pradeep Natarajan, Michael C. Honigberg

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyHeart failureAtrial fibrillationSupraventricular arrhythmiaCoronary artery diseaseEjection fraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), the age-related expansion of blood cells with preleukemic mutations, is associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and heart failure. Whether CHIP independently predicts new-onset arrhythmias is unknown. Methods: UK Biobank participants without prevalent arrhythmias were included. Co-primary study outcomes were supraventricular arrhythmias, bradyarrhythmias, and ventricular arrhythmias. Secondary outcomes were cardiac arrest, atrial fibrillation, and any arrhythmia. Associations of any CHIP (variant allele fraction [VAF] ≥2%), large CHIP (VAF ≥10%) and gene-specific CHIP subtypes with incident arrhythmias were tested using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression. Associations of CHIP with myocardial interstitial fibrosis (T1 times on cardiac magnetic resonance [CMR]) were also tested. Results: This study included 410,879 participants (CHIP: n =13,901 [3.4%]; large CHIP: n =9,197 [2.2%]). Any and large CHIP were associated with adjusted HRs of 1.11 (95%CI, 1.04-1.18; P <0.001) and 1.14 (95%CI, 1.05-1.22; P <0.001) for supraventricular arrhythmias, 1.09 (95%CI, 1.01-1.19; P =0.029) and 1.13 (95%CI, 1.03-1.25; P =0.011) for bradyarrhythmias, and 1.15 (95%CI, 1.00-1.33; P =0.054) and 1.22 (95%CI, 1.03-1.45; P =0.023) for ventricular arrhythmias, respectively. Associations were independent of coronary artery disease and heart failure. Associations were also heterogeneous across arrhythmia subtypes and strongest for cardiac arrest. Gene-specific analyses revealed increased risk of arrhythmias across mutations in driver genes other than DNMT3A ( Figure ) . Large CHIP was associated with 1.30-fold odds (95%CI, 1.07-1.59; P =0.009) of being in the top quintile of myocardial fibrosis by CMR. Conclusions: CHIP may represent a novel risk factor for incident arrhythmias, indicating a potential target for modulation toward arrhythmia prevention and treatment. 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseFrench-language works237,207