Abstract 17362: Left Atrial Stiffness is Increased in Pediatric Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and May Be of Incremental Value in Predicting Major Adverse Cardiac Events in This Group
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Determining risk factors by echocardiography to prevent major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is crucial in pediatric patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Recent studies have shown that LA stiffness and strain may serve as surrogate markers in children, to differentiate elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure from normal and predict COVID-19 related myocardial injury. Hypothesis: LA stiffness may predict MACE in pediatric patients with HCM. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 201 pediatric patients with HCM diagnosed by echocardiography. They were divided into two groups: MACE (n=61) and non-MACE (n=140) groups. LV systolic function, and LA strain were evaluated by conventional 2D and speckle tracking echocardiography. Noninvasive LA stiffness was calculated as the ratio of E/e’ to LA strain as depicted in the following equation: LA Stiffness= E/e ' ratio / LA Peak Strain (% -1 ). The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of MACE (including ICD placement, myomectomy, heart transplant or death) during follow-up. Results: The MACE group showed significantly decreased LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) compared to non-MACE group (GLS - 16.76 ± 5.05% vs. - 20.25 ± 3.40%, p < 0.001), even though LV ejection fraction showed no significant difference between the two groups. LA peak strain was significantly reduced (21.96 ± 7.24% vs. 30.80 ± 7.10%, p < 0.001), whereas, noninvasive LA stiffness was significantly increased (0.72 ± 0.48 % -1 vs. 0.34 ± 0.16 % -1 , p < 0.001) in the MACE group. Among the LV diastolic indices, LA stiffness was the superior-most index for predicting MACE (see Table 1, Figure 1) (AUC: 0.814, cut off value: 0.49% -1 ). Also, LA stiffness was independently associated with increased risk of the composite endpoint of MACE (HR: 3.26 [95% CI: 1.77 -5.99]; P < 0.001, see Table 2). Conclusion: LA stiffness is a newly described index in children, that may be of incremental value in predicting risk of MACE in pediatric HCM patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".