Abstract 12958: Temporal Association of Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers With Incidence of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Botulinum Toxin Type A Administration in Epicardial Fat Pads
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: A one-time injection of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) in epicardial fat pads was evaluated for post-operative atrial fibrillation (POAF) in patients undergoing open-chest cardiac surgery in the Ph2 NOVA trial. Treatment with 125U BoNT/A numerically reduced the incidence of POAF in the mITT (36.5% vs 46.1%) and CABG populations (28.4% vs 40.0%), with statistical significance observed in the CABG + ≥65 years subgroup (27.5% vs 56.4%; P <0.01). No significant reduction was observed in the 250U group vs placebo. Purpose: Explore systemic inflammatory biomarker changes after treatment with BoNT/A and the temporal relation to incidence of POAF. Methods: This analysis included 308 patients who received 125U BoNT/A (n=103), 250U BoNT/A (n=103), or placebo (n=102). Subgroup analysis was done for CABG (n=198), age ≥65 years (n=185), and CABG + ≥65 years (n=118). Serum samples were collected preoperatively prior to dosing on Day 1, then post-treatment on Days 2-4 to test for IL-6, IL-10, and hsCRP. A 2-sample t test was used for mean concentrations and a linear mixed model was used for fold change (FC) from baseline. Results: Baseline levels of IL-6, IL-10, and hsCRP were similar between treatment groups. Reduction of IL-6 (45.7 ± 4.4 vs 62.4 ± 5.8 pg/mL, P <0.05; 10.8 vs 15.9 FC, P <0.01) and IL-10 (1.49 ± 0.13 vs 2.04 ± 0.24 pg/mL, P <0.05; 1.96 vs 2.66 FC, P <0.01) was most significant on Day 2 in CABG patients treated with 125U vs placebo, which aligns with the highest rate and risk of POAF (Figure 1). Mean hsCRP was most significantly reduced on Day 4 in the 250U group among CABG patients (193 ± 8 vs 227 ± 10 mg/dL, P <0.01) followed by 125U vs placebo (196 ± 10 vs 227 ± 10 mg/dL, P <0.05); a similar dose-dependent reduction was observed by FC analysis. Conclusions: Treatment with 125U BoNT/A in cardiac surgery patients lowered the incidence of POAF vs placebo and reduced postoperative systemic IL-6 and IL-10 on Day 2, most significantly in the CABG population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".