MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 14843: Unveiling the Phenotype of Smooth Muscle Foam Cells in Human Atherosclerotic Lesions: Insights From Bulk and Single Cell RNA Sequencing

2023· article· en· W4389956891 on OpenAlexaff
Sima Allahverdian, Pinhao Xiang, Valentin Blanchard, Başak Şahin, Teddy Chan, Gordon A. Francis

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoam cellCellRNAPhenotypeTranscriptomeMolecular biologyMacrophageGeneGene expressionMedicinePathologyBiologyBiochemistryIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims: Our previous studies of human coronary atherosclerosis and ApoE-/- mice indicated that at least 50% and ~70% of foam cells are of smooth muscle cell (SMC) origin, respectively. We also found that SMCs generate a distinct class of foam cells, due to several gene expression and regulatory differences compared to macrophage foam cells. In the current investigation we utilized transcriptomic approaches to identify and characterize the phenotype of SMC foam cells of human coronary plaques and in SMCs treated with aggregated LDL (ag-LDL). Methods: Sections of fresh human coronary artery were subjected to gentle digestion and the isolated cells used for single-cell RNA Sequencing (scRNA-Seq) (n=3) using 10X Genomics Chromium Single Cell 3’ Reagent Kits v3 Technology. Human vascular SMCs were treated with 100 μg/mL ag-LDL for 24 h (n=3) and stained with the fluorescent lipid probe BODIPY493/503. BODIPY high SMCs were collected and subjected to bulk RNA sequencing along with non-treated SMCs as control. Results: Single cell RNA sequencing of cells isolated from human coronary arteries followed by unsupervised Seurat-based clustering (R version 4.2.0) identified 15 distinct clusters including 8 SMC clusters with varying degrees of differentiation and macrophage foam and non-foam cells. The top 70 upregulated genes in ag-LDL treated SMCs were used to identify clusters corresponding to SMC foam cells in the scRNA-seq dataset. We found that these genes are mostly enriched in 2 clusters of less differentiated SMCs. SMC and macrophage foam cell clusters display distinct characteristics. SMC foam cell clusters exhibit upregulation of complement and coagulation cascades, as well as ECM-receptor interaction genes. In contrast, the macrophage foam cell cluster shows enrichment of proinflammatory genes, genes involved in the response to unfolded protein, and both pro- and anti-apoptotic genes. Conclusion: Our studies provide novel tools to investigate the nature of SMC foam cells in human atherosclerosis and may provide unique markers for SMC foam cells. Gaining a comprehensive insight of the significance and characteristics of SMC foam cells is crucial in elucidating their ultimate role and potential as a therapeutic target in atherosclerosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicAtherosclerosis and Cardiovascular DiseasesFrench-language works237,207