Abstract 12812: Temporal Trends of Calcium Modification Therapies in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Various techniques with different mechanisms of action are presently available for the modification of coronary calcium in chronic total occlusions (CTOs). Hypothesis: We sought to examine the temporal trends in the use of calcium modification therapies in a large multicenter CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) registry. Methods: We analyzed data from 13,079 CTO PCIs performed in 12,799 patients at 46 US and non-US centers between 2012 and 2023. Calcification was assessed by angiography as mild (spots), moderate (involving ≤50% of the reference lesion diameter), or severe (involving >50% of the reference lesion diameter). Results: Moderate or severe calcification was present in 6,094 CTOs (46.6%). Among CTO lesions with moderate or severe calcium, one or more calcium modification techniques was used in 1,006 cases (16.9%); rotational atherectomy (7.2%, n=434), laser atherectomy (3.4%, n=203), intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) (3.4%, n=200), scoring balloon (3.0%, n=178), cutting balloon (1.8%, n=109), orbital atherectomy (1.5%, n=91), and Chocolate balloon (Teleflex, 0.3%, n=15). Over time, the use of calcium modification techniques for lesions with moderate to severe calcification increased from 2.5% in 2012 to 25.7% in 2023 (p for trend <0.001), with a significant increase in the use of IVL (from 0.6% in 2020 to 16.6% in 2023; p for trend <0.001) (Central Illustration). In the last 2 years (2021-2023), IVL was the most commonly used calcium modification technique followed by rotational atherectomy. Conclusions: The use of calcium modification techniques for calcified CTO lesions increased over time, with a significant increase in the use of IVL in the last years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".