MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 15667: The Transvalvular Pressure Gradient to Valve Area Ratio: A Novel, Simple Doppler Echocardiographic Parameter to Adjudicate Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Severity

2023· article· en· W4389957073 on OpenAlexaff
Sebastien Hecht, Mohamed‐Salah Annabi, Viktória Stanová, Abdellaziz Dahou, Ian G. Burwash, Matthias Koschutnik, Philipp E. Bartko, Jutta Bergler‐Klein, Julia Mascherbauer, Stefan Orwat, Helmut Baumgartner, João L. Cavalcante, Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro, Josep Rodés‐Cabau, Marie‐Annick Clavel, Philippe Pîbarot

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart InstituteUniversity of OttawaInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineReceiver operating characteristicStenosisAortic valveAortic valve stenosisHazard ratioArea under the curveProspective cohort studyAortic valve replacementConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In patients with low-gradient (LG) aortic stenosis (AS), dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) or aortic valve calcium scoring (AVCS) by computed tomography is required to confirm AS severity and the indication for intervention. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the mean transvalvular gradient to effective orifice area ratio (MG/EOA, in mmHg/cm 2 ) measured during rest echocardiography predicts true-severe AS (TSAS) and clinical outcomes in LG-AS patients. The present study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of the MG/EOA ratio in LG-AS patients. Methods: The diagnostic accuracy of the MG/EOA ratio to predict TSAS was assessed in: i) an in vitro dataset obtained in a circulatory model, and ii) an in vivo dataset collected in 198 patients recruited in the prospective observational cohort TOPAS study (NCT01835028), using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The prognostic value of this parameter was assessed using spline curve analysis and multivariate Cox regression, using a composite of aortic valve replacement or all-cause mortality at 2-years as clinical endpoint. Results: The MG/EOA ratio at rest predicted TSAS with an area under the ROC curve of 0.99 [0.98-1.00] in the in vitro dataset and 0.92 [0.87-0.95] in the in vivo dataset of LG-AS patients. In the in vivo dataset predominantly composed of patients with a low flow state, the optimal cut-off of MG/EOA ratio was 29 mmHg/cm 2 with a normal flow state (percentage of correct classification: 95%) and 25 mmHg/cm 2 with a low flow state (85%). In LG-AS patients, a MG/EOA ratio ≥ 23 mmHg/cm 2 was associated with increased risk of the composite endpoint (unadjusted HR=2.16 [1.58-3.06], p<0.001; adjusted HR=2.80 [1.94-4.03], p<0.001). The net reclassification index (NRI) of the resting parameter MG/EOA was 0.57 (p<0.001), which was similar to projected EOA (NRI=0.61, p<0.001) measured by DSE. Conclusion: We propose a new, easily obtainable parameter from standard echocardiography that outperforms other rest echocardiographic parameters and is non-inferior to DSE with respect to diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value. The MG/EOA ratio can be useful in LG-AS to confirm AS severity and may thus avoid the use of additional tests such as DSE or AVCS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→