MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 15416: High Neighbourhood-Level Material Deprivation is Associated With Increased Rates of Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With ASCVD: A Population-Based Cohort Study

2023· article· en· W4389957302 on OpenAlexaffabout
Maya S. Sheth, Irene Jeong, Anna Chu, Shalane Basque, Jiming Fang, Peter C. Austin, Candace D. McNaughton, Husam Abdel‐Qadir, Dennis T. Ko, Douglas S. Lee, Jacob A. Udell

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkSunnybrook Health Science CentreInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioMyocardial infarctionStroke (engine)CohortPopulationInternal medicineAnginaCause of deathCoronary artery diseaseCohort studyCardiologyDemographyConfidence intervalDiseaseEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Disparities in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) may persist even in jurisdictions with universal health care. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between material deprivation and cardiovascular (CV) events in a population with established ASCVD. Methods: This population-based cohort study identified individuals in Ontario, Canada ≥66 years old as of January 1, 2019, with an ASCVD event in the prior 10 years. The primary exposure was neighbourhood-level material deprivation, denoting the inability to attain basic material needs, categorized into quintiles, from Q1 (least deprived) to Q5 (most deprived). Cause-specific hazard models estimated the association between material deprivation and CV outcomes over 3 years, adjusted for baseline characteristics. Trend tests across deprivation quintiles were performed. Results: Among 195,742 individuals with established ASCVD (median age 76 years, 37.3% female), individuals in the most deprived neighbourhoods (Q5) had higher rates of co-morbid conditions and CV disease, including myocardial infarction (MI), angina, peripheral artery disease, and coronary artery bypass grafts, compared to those in the least deprived neighbourhoods (Q1). Q5 residents had higher hazards of the composite outcome of all-cause death, MI, or stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20 [95% CI, 1.16-1.24]), and component outcomes: all-cause death (HR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.19-1.28]), MI (HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.11-1.31]), stroke (HR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.03-1.23]), and heart failure (HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.16-1.28]), compared to Q1 residents. There were no significant differences for Q5 versus Q1 for coronary revascularization (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.90-1.04]). We observed a progressive increase in risk across each quintile of deprivation (P-trend <0.05 for all outcomes). Conclusion: Despite universal health care, increasing deprivation was independently associated with higher rates of CV outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207