MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 15168: The Role of Mitochondrial Fission Factor (MFF) and Increased Midzone Mitochondrial Fission in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Implications for Proliferation, Mitophagy, and Apoptosis

2023· article· en· W4389957320 on OpenAlexaff
Pierce Colpman, Kuang-Huieh Chen, Jeffrey Mewburn, Ian Goodall-Halliwell, Asish Das Gupta, Stephen L. Archer

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMitochondrial fissionFIS1DNM1LCell biologyMitophagyFissionBiologyMitochondrionApoptosismitochondrial fusionMitochondrial DNAAutophagyBiochemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The obstructive vasculopathy in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) results from unrestricted proliferation and impaired apoptosis of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells (PASMC). This pseudoneoplastic phenotype is partly due to increased mitotic fission i.e. the highly coordinated processes of mitochondrial fission and nuclear division. Two types of mitochondrial fission have been reported: peripheral fission, which eliminates damaged terminal portions of mitochondria via mitophagy, and midzone fission, which is linked to mitochondrial biogenesis and cellular proliferation. While all fission involves dynamin related protein 1 (Drp1), the Drp1 binding partner differs between these processes with mitochondrial fission factor (MFF) mediating midzone fission, whilst fission protein 1 (Fis1) governs peripheral fission. Here we explore the role of MFF and Fis1 in the pathogenesis of PAH. Hypothesis: Midzone fission is increased in PAH PASMC and inhibiting midzone fission by downregulating MFF will decrease cell proliferation and induce apoptosis. Methods: MitoMeter, a mitochondrial segmentation and tracking application, was adapted for automated analysis of the location of mitochondrial fission events. Immunoblots were used to assess the expression of MFF and Fis1 in control (n=4) vs. PAH (n=5) human PASMC. Flow cytometry was used to assess cell proliferation (EdU) and rates of apoptosis (Annexin V) (n=3). Results: Midzone fission, as a % of total fission events, is increased (PAH= 48.7%±6.9, Ctrl = 28.9%± 5.1p<0.05). Moreover, MFF expression is increased in PAH PASMC (p<0.05). Conversely, peripheral fission is decreased (PAH=51.2%±6.9, Ctrl = 71.0±5.1). Silencing MFF inhibited midzone fission (siCtrl=54.93.1%, siMFF = 39.37.4%), while Fis1 knockdown inhibited peripheral fission in PAH PASMC (siCtrl = 45.13.1%, siFis1 = 36.91.9%), p<0.05 each. Inhibiting MFF inhibited PAH PASMC proliferation (siCtrl =36.50.9%, siMFF = 23.50.5%, p<0.05) and induced apoptosis in PAH PASMC (siCtrl=3.90.3% versus siMFF 7.40.2%, p<0.05). Conclusion: MFF mediated midzone fission is upregulated in PAH PASMC contributing to increased proliferation, and reduced apoptosis. Inhibiting MFF may be a new therapeutic strategy in PAH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→