MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389961290 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3344223

Radio Map Construction via Graph Signal Processing for Indoor Localization

2023· article· en· W4389961290 on OpenAlexaff
Qiao Li, Xuewen Liao, Ang Li, Shahrokh Valaee

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersKey Science and Technology Program of Shaanxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceFingerprint (computing)BottleneckMultipath propagationGraphRadio propagationCluster analysisFingerprint recognitionArtificial intelligenceSampling (signal processing)Computer visionReal-time computingAlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceTelecommunicationsEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, fingerprint-based localization has become a promising solution for indoor positioning because of its great performance in complex multipath environments. However, the extensive time and labor effort of constructing the radio map has become the bottleneck that hinders the adaptation of fingerprint-based localization in practice. In this article, we propose a novel cost-efficient radio map construction scheme, which relies on the fingerprint measurements from only a small number of reference points (RPs) via graph signal sampling and recovery techniques. First, using the topological characteristics of RPs, we model the radio map as a graph and design the angle fingerprint for the band-limited graph signal. Subsequently, the radio map is built based on graph clustering, sampling set selection and signal recovery. Extensive simulations are performed in a geometry-based ray tracing signal propagation model, which demonstrates that the proposed method can recover the radio map with low-collection cost and outperform existing solutions in terms of fingerprint accuracy and localization performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207