MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389966162 · doi:10.1101/2023.12.18.23300177

The global burden of HIV among Long-distance truck drivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2023· review· en· W4389966162 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cyrus Mutie, Berrick Otieno, Elijah Mwangi, Rosemary Kawira, Albanus Mutisya, John Gachohi, Grace Wambura Mbuthia

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
KeywordsMeta-analysisGlobal healthMedicineCINAHLEnvironmental healthHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Systematic reviewDeveloping countryDemographyGeographyPsychological interventionMEDLINEPublic healthEconomic growthPolitical scienceFamily medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Long-distance truck drivers (LDTDs) endure a disproportionately high burden of HIV in various global settings. However, unlike other most at-risk populations, the global burden of HIV among LDTDs has not been documented so far. The result has been poor allocation and distribution of the limited HIV preventive resources for LDTDs in most parts of the world. Thus, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the global burden of HIV among LDTDs. A comprehensive electronic search was conducted in PubMed, ProQuest Central, PubMed Central, CINAHL, and Global Index Medicus to identify relevant information published in English on HIV prevalence among LDTDs from 1989 to the 16 th of May 2023. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to establish the burden of HIV at global and regional levels. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) tools were used to assess the quality of the included studies. Of the 1787 articles identified, 43 were included. Most of the included studies were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa (44.19%, n=19), and Asia and the Pacific (37.21%, n=16). The pooled prevalence of HIV was 3.82%. The burden of HIV was highest in sub-Saharan Africa at 14.34%, followed by Asia and the Pacific at 2.14%, and lastly Western, Central Europe and North America at 0.17%. The overall heterogeneity score was ( I 2 = 98.2%, p < 0.001). The global burden of HIV among LDTDs is 3.82%, six times higher than that of the general population globally. Compared to other regions, the burden of HIV is highest in sub-Saharan Africa at 14.34%, where it’s estimated to be 3% in the general population. Thus, LDTDs endure a disproportionately high burden of HIV compared to other populations. Consequently, more LDTD-centred HIV research and surveillance is needed at national and regional levels to institute tailored preventive policies and interventions. PROSPERO Number CRD42023429390

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.032
Bibliometrics0.0080.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions→French-language works237,207→