MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 16783: Discovery and Characterization of Transient Endothelial Stem-Like Cells Responsible for Rapid Lung Microvascular Regeneration Post Endothelial Ablation

2023· article· en· W4389977993 on OpenAlexaff
Elmira Safaie Qamsari, Nicholas D Cober, Rafael Soares Godoy, Liyuan Wang, Ken Schlosser, Duncan J. Stewart

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBiomarkers in Disease Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStem cellProgenitor cellEndothelial protein C receptorEndothelial stem cellCell biologyPopulationCD34LungImmunologyMedicineRegeneration (biology)BiologyCancer researchIn vitroThrombinInternal medicinePlatelet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has revealed two main types of alveolar capillary endothelial cells (ECs): aCap ECs (or aerocytes) express typical aCap markers, including apelin, whereas general (gCap) ECs express apelin receptor, Aplnr /APJ. Aerocytes constitute the air-blood barrier and are incapable of proliferation, unlike smaller gCap ECs that can proliferate. Hypothesis: After lung microvascular injury, gCap ECs give rise to stem-like ECs that can regenerate depleted lung EC populations, including highly specialized aerocytes. Approach: scRNA-seq was used to study depletion and regeneration of lung EC populations after intratracheal instillation of diphtheria toxin (DT) in transgenic mice harboring an EC-targeted human DT receptor. Results: DT resulted in ~80% loss of lung microvascular EC populations including aerocytes, associated with severe acute lung injury (ALI), and there was full spontaneous recovery by day 7. Interestingly, a novel EC population appeared at day 3 post injury in a transitional gCap EC cluster characterized by paradoxical expression of ‘aCap’ marker, apelin, together with endothelial progenitor/stem cell markers, Cd34 and endothelial protein C receptor ( Procr /EPCR). These ‘transient endothelial stem-like cells’ (TESCs) transitioned to highly proliferative progenitor-like FoxM1 + cells ultimately repopulating all depleted EC populations by day 7. Using flow cytometry of lung cells harvested at 3 days post DT instillation, TESCs were identified by unique co-expression of CD34 and EPCR (Figure), thereby allowing isolation and culture in vitro for further characterization of their proliferation and differentiation potential. Conclusions: Lung microvascular repair is orchestrated by the emergence of stem-like, gCap ECs (TESCs), transiently expressing aCap/aerocyte marker, apelin, together with Procr /EPCR, which have the capacity to regenerate lung microvasculature rapidly and efficiently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.720

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicBiomarkers in Disease MechanismsFrench-language works237,207