19th-century thermosiphon ventilation and its potential for heat recovery in buildings today
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<h2>Summary</h2> A forgotten thermosiphon scheme is found in Montreal's former Royal Victoria Hospital and traced back to the original Center Block of Canada's Parliament Hill. This discovery inspires an investigation into the fluid mechanics of heat recovery with buoyancy ventilation, where interior spaces are arranged in an open thermal loop with heat exchange through partition walls. Flow visualizations with physical models are used to corroborate the archival evidence and show how the historical scheme worked. The scheme is then generalized, defining a criterion for steady unidirectional flow <mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>></mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math> and a heat recovery limit when room temperatures upstream and downstream reach equilibrium <mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn>50</mml:mn><mml:mo>%</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow>.</mml:mrow></mml:math> This mathematical model is validated experimentally, demonstrating steady flow <mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math> close to the efficiency limit <mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math> with a balanced thermal design <mml:math><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math>. Further analysis shows significant heating savings are possible in mildly cold seasons compared to natural displacement (74%) and natural mixing (60%) ventilation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".