Intracortical Myelin in Youths at Risk for Depression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability. To understand why depression develops, it is important to distinguish between early neural markers of vulnerability that precede the onset of MDD and features that develop during depression. Recent neuroimaging findings suggest that reduced global and regional intracortical myelination (ICM), especially in the lateral prefrontal cortex, may be associated with depression, but it is unknown whether it is a precursor or a consequence of MDD. The study of offspring of affected parents offers the opportunity to distinguish between precursors and consequences by examining individuals who carry high risk at a time when they have not experienced depression. Methods: We acquired 129 T1-weighted and T2-weighted scans from 56 (25 female) unaffected offspring of parents with depression and 114 scans from 63 (34 female) unaffected offspring of parents without a history of depression (ages 9 to 16 years). To assess scan quality, we calculated test-retest reliability. We used the scan ratios to calculate myelin maps for 68 cortical regions. We analyzed data using mixed-effects modeling. Results: = .08) analyses. Our pediatric sample had high ICM reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.55-0.88). Conclusions: Based on our results, reduced ICM does not appear to be a precursor of MDD. Future studies should examine ICM in familial high-risk youths across a broad developmental period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".