High-Performance Plasma Biomarker Panel for Alzheimer’s Disease Screening Using a Femtomolar-Level Label-Free Biosensing System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia in older people. However, diagnosing AD through noncognitive methods, such as invasive cerebrospinal fluid sampling or radioactive positron emission tomography, has limited applications. Herein, the femtomolar levels of AD biomarkers amyloid β 40 (Aβ40), amyloid β 42 (Aβ42), phosphorylated tau 181 (P-tau181), phosphorylated tau 217 (P-tau217), and neurofilament light chain (NfL) were determined in human plasma in multicenter clinical cohorts using an ultrasensitive graphene field-effect transistor sensor. A machine-learning algorithm was also used to assemble these plasma biomarkers and optimize their performance in discriminating individual stages of Alzheimer's dementia progression. The "composite-info" biomarker panel, which combines these biomarkers and clinical information, considerably improved the staging performance in AD progression. It achieved an area under the curve of >0.94 in the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. In addition, the panel demonstrated an advantage in the individual-based stage assessment compared with that of the Mini-Mental State Examination/Montreal Cognitive Assessment and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. This study provides a composite biomarker panel for the screening and early diagnosis of AD using a rapid detection system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".