MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390042996 · doi:10.1016/j.neo.2023.100957

Immune infiltration, aggressive pathology, and poor survival outcomes in RECQL helicase deficient breast cancers

2023· article· en· W4390042996 on OpenAlexaff
Ayat Lashen, Abdulbaqi Al-Kawaz, Jennie N. Jeyapalan, Shatha Alqahtani, Ahmed Shoqafi, Mashael Algethami, Michael S. Toss, Andrew R. Green, Nigel P. Mongan, Sudha Sharma, Mohammad R. Akbari, Emad A. Rakha, Srinivasan Madhusudan

Bibliographic record

VenueNeoplasia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioWomen's College HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerFOXP3Cancer researchInfiltration (HVAC)Immune systemPathologyBiologyDuctal carcinomaCD8OncologyMedicineCancerInternal medicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RECQL is essential for genomic stability. Here, we evaluated RECQL in 449 pure ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS), 152 DCIS components of mixed DCIS/invasive breast cancer (IBC) tumors, 157 IBC components of mixed DCIS/IBC and 50 normal epithelial terminal ductal lobular units (TDLUs). In 726 IBCs, CD8+, FOXP3+, IL17+, PDL1+, PD1+ T-cell infiltration (TILs) were investigated in RECQL deficient and proficient cancers. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) was evaluated in five RECQL germ-line mutation carriers with IBC by genome sequencing. Compared with normal epithelial cells, a striking reduction in nuclear RECQL in DCIS was evident with aggressive pathology and poor survival. In RECQL deficient IBCs, CD8+, FOXP3+, IL17+ or PDL1+ TILs were linked with aggressive pathology and shorter survival. In germline RECQL mutation carriers, increased TMB was observed in 4/5 tumors. We conclude that RECQL loss is an early event in breast cancer and promote immune cell infiltration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score0.546

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeoplasiaSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207