MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390055854 · doi:10.1093/hgs/dcad043

<i>From the Vilna Ghetto to Nuremberg: Memoir and Testimony</i>. Abraham Sutzkever

2023· article· en· W4390055854 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samuel D. Kassow

Bibliographic record

VenueHolocaust and Genocide Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemoirLawArtPolitical sciencePhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abraham (Avrom) Sutzkever (1913–2010) was among the most remarkable poets of the twentieth century. Though he left Vilna in 1946, he remained inextricably linked with the city as well as the Yiddish language. Although Vilna had only a fraction of the Jewish population of such larger cities as Warsaw, it was a cultural center and a beacon of Jewish pride and creativity in the Diaspora. Jews had a special name for Vilna: Yerushalayim d’Lite (The Jerusalem of Lithuania). Alongside this legacy, what mattered most to Sutzkever and many of his young friends in prewar Vilna was the special place of Yiddish. At a time when Yiddish was in decline elsewhere, it still flourished in Vilna. Before the war, the young Sutzkever was an up-and-coming Yiddish poet; however, his beautifully crafted verse—with its exquisite evocations of Siberian forests and Vilna’s landscape—made him an outlier in the Yiddish literary scene, which demanded protest and social engagement in response to fascism, poverty and growing antisemitism. On June 24, 1941, the Nazis seized Vilna. Sutzkever and his young wife attempted to escape, but were forced back into the city. Between June 1941 and January 1942, the Germans and their Lithuanian helpers murdered two thirds of Vilna’s Jews. Of an original Jewish population of seventy thousand (counting refugees) in June 1941, only twenty thousand remained in the Vilna ghetto, which the Germans finally liquidated in September 1943.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0630.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHolocaust and Genocide StudiesSame topicGerman History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207