Effect of sesame paste by protease hydrolysis: Physicochemical properties, storage stability, and flavor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this study, the effect of protease hydrolysis on the stability and flavor of a sesame oil–paste system was investigated. The optimum amount of protease addition, determined by testing the effects of protease addition on the improvement in the oil–paste separation of sesame paste (SP), was investigated using 7% neutral protease (NP), 5% papain (PP), 7% trypsin (TP), and 5% flavourzyme (FZ). The flavor differences among these four groups of samples were investigated, and storage experiments were conducted for 28 days to observe the changes in quality. Finally, the principal component analysis (PCA) calculations showed that the samples in the 5% FP group performed the best, with a considerable improvement in the stability of the sesame paste–oil system during storage. The oil separation capacity (OSC) decreased by 9.1% during storage, the acid value (AV) increased by 1.00 mg/g and the peroxide value (POV) increased by 0.3 mmol/kg compared with those of the control group. This group also had the highest total sensory (4.25 score) and nutty (5.83 score) scores based on the total pyrazine content. Therefore, protease hydrolysis has promising application prospects for increasing the stability of sesame paste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it