MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390059002 · doi:10.18280/acsm.470605

Stress Analysis in a Multiscale Composite Laminated Plate with Cutout at the Centre Using Finite Element Method

2023· article· en· W4390059002 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
C. Srinivas, Veera Venkata Siva Sudheer Nakka, Sneha H. Dhoria

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de Chimie Science des Matériaux · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Material Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodStructural engineeringComposite numberStress (linguistics)Composite plateMaterials scienceComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orthotropic rectangular plates, featuring central cutouts and subjected to in-plane loading, are extensively employed across various engineering fields, including mechanical, automobile, aerospace, and marine.The introduction of a cutout inevitably leads to stress concentration within the plate.Incorporating carbon nanotubes (CNTs) into the polymer matrix composite has been noted to induce significant heterogeneity in stress fields.Functioning as bridges between the fibers and the matrix, CNTs can effectively mitigate stress concentration and enhance the damage tolerance of the composite.However, accurately determining stress concentration in CNT-based composites requires comprehensive understanding of the geometric discontinuity edge and well-defined evaluation techniques.Among these, the finite element method emerges as a straightforward yet precise approach for studying stress concentration around geometric discontinuities.The present work harnesses the finite element method to investigate stress concentration in CNT-based multiscale composite plates (Glass Fiber/CNT/Epoxy) with central cutouts under static in-plane loading.To validate the model, the derived results are compared with analytical data from conventional composite materials.Moreover, the impact of cutout size on stress concentration is examined for three distinct configurations: plates with a central circular cutout, plates with an elliptical central cutout (major axis in the longitudinal direction), and plates with an elliptical central cutout (major axis in the transverse direction).Preliminary findings suggest a correlation between increased cutout size and augmented percentage reduction in stress concentration.Notably, the maximum percentage reduction in stress concentration is observed in the case of plates hosting an elliptical cutout at the center with the major axis aligned in the transverse direction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de Chimie Science des MatériauxSame topicComposite Material MechanicsFrench-language works237,207