Blood Oxygenation and Heart Rate Changes After Diamorphine Intravenous Injection During Opioid Agonist Treatment for Outpatients With Heroin Dependence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: More than 60 million people use opioids each year, and many countries have declared an opioid overdose crisis. Heroin, one of the most commonly used opioids, has depressant effects on autonomic functioning; however, few studies have been able to examine the effects of heroin or its pharmaceutically prepared equivalent, diamorphine, in human clinical populations. The present study examined heart rate and oxygen saturation in the minutes immediately after acute diamorphine administration in outpatients with heroin dependence. METHODS: The sample was a subset of participants (N = 36) in the German Project of Heroin Assisted Treatment of Opiate Dependent Patients Trial in Bonn, Germany. Patients were given 3 daily doses of intravenous diamorphine. Doses were determined on an individual basis by study physicians. Pulse oximetry was recorded at baseline and at 30-second intervals from 0 to 450 seconds after diamorphine administration. RESULTS: Heart rate was significantly higher than baseline at 30 seconds after diamorphine administration and significantly lower than baseline at 270 seconds onward. Oxygen saturation was significantly lower than baseline at 60 seconds onward. CONCLUSIONS: Results are consistent with other studies in which depressant effects of opioids were observed. Our findings suggest that even therapeutic doses of diamorphine may have rapid and significant-predominantly depressant-effects on oxygenation and heart rate in populations that frequently use opioids. Monitoring of potential adverse opioid effects would be beneficial even in populations presumed to have developed physiological tolerance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".