MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390071720 · doi:10.1353/ndq.2023.a915758

As If, and: Ashes

2023· article· en· W4390071720 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Margot Block

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œNorth Dakota quarterly · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryCONTESTArtHumanityCeremonyArt historyVisual artsLiteratureHistoryMedia studiesSociologyPhilosophyTheologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As If, and: Ashes Margot Block (bio) As If I remember the length of my body as if it was beautiful and stillI dream this way in the moonlight you have sent meand that we are, we were wrong about everything [End Page 68] Ashes in the newspaperthere is a humanity that electrocutesour bending hearts they compromiseI saw the sun riseand I saw it in the ashes of every civilizationquietlyI loved you and never spoke of itI know the tenderness of every word is not enoughthat rainbows were dipped in blackthat we could not betray these secretslike children we tired the artistic strugglesthe many conversation it inspireswhile there is a vision of life and losswhere is the forgotten poverty you speak ofwhere are the beaten women you cannot forgetas the blood of my poem disappearsthe shallow waves recoveryou were beautifulwearing the largest of heartsno longer sufferingno longer beautifulas I spit out a narrow reflection [End Page 69] Margot Block margot block has been writing since the age of fourteen and has been published in many journals. She participated in the high school mentorship program with the Manitoba Writers Guild, working with Canadian poet Carol Rose. She won first prize in a poetry contest sponsored by the Writers Collective and an honorable mention in a poetry contest sponsored by the Lake Winnipeg Writers Group. Copyright © 2023 University of North Dakota

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œNorth Dakota quarterlySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207