MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390078120 · doi:10.1017/s1355617723003260

7 The Role of Depressive Symptomatology in Predicting Cognitive and Functional Decline in Memory Clinic Patients

2023· article· en· W4390078120 on OpenAlexaff
Shuang Cai, Andrew Kirk, Chandima Karunanayake, Devin A. Edwards, Megan E. O’Connell, Debra Morgan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClinical Dementia RatingDementiaMemory clinicCognitive declineDepression (economics)CognitionPopulationPsychiatryMedicineCohortClinical psychologyCohort studyAlzheimer's diseasePsychologyDistressDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Depressive symptomatology has long been shown to be associated with the onset of dementia, though the exact form and directionality of this association remains unclear. While much research has gone into confirming this link, there has been little investigation into the effects of depression on dementia progression after diagnosis. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between depressive symptomatology and cognitive and behavioural decline over the following year. Participants and Methods: In a Rural and Remote Memory Clinic, 375 patients consecutively diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), or non-AD dementia completed the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) at first visit and one-year follow-up to assess depressive symptomatology. The same cohort were evaluated for cognitive and behavioural decline through the completion of five clinical tests performed at the first visit and at one-year follow-up. Cognitive decline was assessed using the Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE) and the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR). Neuropsychiatric symptoms were assessed using two subsets of data from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI severity and distress), both of which are completed by the patients’ caregivers. Functional decline was assessed using the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ). In both cognitive and functional decline, data were analyzed with linear regression analysis in the population subgroups of All Type Dementia (ATD, which includes MCI for this study) (N=375), Alzheimer’s type dementia (N=187), and Mild Cognitive Impairment (N=74). Results: In this study, we observed no correlation between CES-D scores at baseline and cognitive or functional decline over one year. However, we observed a significant positive correlation between changes in CES-D scores and NPI-severity scores over one year in patients with ATD (likely the most reliable observation from this study due to larger statistical power) and in the MCI subgroup, but not in the AD subgroup. This relationship may be attributable to a relationship between depression and neuropsychiatric symptoms in general, or to the fact that a person with dementia who exhibits more depressive symptomatology appears more impaired and causes greater distress in their caregivers, despite stability in the objective measures of their cognitive and functional status. This finding may indicate that intervention for depression is needed to alleviated caregiver burden when managing dementia patients. Conclusions: Increasingly severe depressive symptomatology may exacerbate neuropsychiatric symptomatology but did not correlate with cognitive and functional decline in patients with dementia. More studies are needed to help delineate the relationship between depression and dementia progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the International Neuropsychological SocietySame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207