3 The Lived Experiences of Pediatric Stroke Survivors: A Qualitative Perspective on Psychosocial Outcomes and Quality of Life
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Despite knowledge concerning the prevalence and adverse consequences of pediatric stroke, there is limited awareness of the immediate and long-term effects on social-emotional functioning and psychological adjustment. Evidence from the broader childhood literature suggests that young individuals living with disabilities or neurological conditions are at considerably greater risk for emotional and behavioral concerns and lower quality of life. Qualitative research methodology can elucidate personal and subjective aspects of experience that cannot be entirely represented through quantitative measures. Although the parent experience of pediatric stroke has been qualitatively investigated, we endeavored to fill a gap in the pediatric stroke literature by focusing on the youth voice. The current project aimed to qualitatively explore emotional, behavioral, and social outcomes in pediatric stroke and identify personal and environmental factors that can influence psychological risk and resilience. Participants and Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with 14 children, aged 8 to 18 years, with a history of ischemic stroke. The semi-structured interview protocol aimed to capture the lived experience of survivors and encompassed open-ended questions about daily life, memories, perceptions, and psychosocial experiences. Interviews spanned 40-60 minutes in length, were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and qualitatively analyzed using reflexive Thematic Analysis methodology. Coding, theme generation, and data visualization were completed using NVivo12 software. Results: Participants discussed their views and understanding of their stroke, the perceived impact of stroke on their daily life, and the meaning-making process surrounding this experience. Children shared their perceptions regarding their abilities, challenges, life circumstances, aspirations, and relations to peers. Prominent themes encompassed shyness and social anxiety, cognitive and learning troubles, test anxiety, concealing feelings of sadness, the stigma of physical disability and its impact on social participation, bullying, and loneliness/isolation. Insight into adaptive coping mechanisms was present, as was emphasis on family closeness and the importance of supportive peers. Participants described feeling unique and were proud of their values and personal identity. Gratitude was expressed regarding stroke medical care and rehabilitative services, with an emergent theme surrounding the desire to give back to society. Conclusions: Taken together, our qualitative study findings illustrate the profound impact that pediatric stroke can have on children’s emotional experiences, personal identity, self-efficacy, learning, behavior, and psychosocial functioning. Despite these challenges, an enormous degree of resiliency was also demonstrated in youth’s insights into coping and adaptation to challenge. Our findings speak to the importance of psychological assessment and treatment planning surrounding internalizing symptoms in children with stroke. Given the potential for pervasive changes in various aspects of daily life, a comprehensive understanding of the personal psychological experiences and perceptions of pediatric stroke patients is essential, as it will facilitate opportunity for timely interventions that can improve coping and adaptive outcome. Implications will be discussed with regard to empowering pediatric stroke survivors, enhancing public education efforts about childhood acquired brain injury, and reducing stigma associated with disability and use of required supports.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".