62 Prediction of Mild Cognitive Impairment Conversion Using Cox Model in Parkinson’s Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a critical state to consider. In fact, PD patients with MCI are more likely to develop dementia than the general population. Thus, identifying the risk factors for developing MCI in patients with PD could help with disease prevention. We aim to use the Cox regression model to identify the variables involved in the development of MCI in healthy controls (HC) and in a PD cohort. Participants and Methods: The Parkinson’s Progressive Markers Initiative (PPMI) database was used to analyze data from 166 HC and 365 patients with PD. They were analyzed longitudinally, at baseline and at 3-year follow up. Both HC and PD were further divided in 2 groups based on the presence or absence of MCI. Conversion to MCI was defined as the first detection of MCI. For all participants, we extracted the (1) Neuropsychiatric symptoms (anxiety, impulsive-compulsive disorders and sleep impairment), (2) 3T MRI-based data (cortical and subcortical brain volumes based on the Desikan atlas, using FreeSurfer 7.1.1) and (3) genetic markers (MAPT and APOE £4 genes). We used Python 3.9 to perform three Cox proportional hazard models (PD-HC, HC only and PD only) and to model the risk of conversion to MCI, attributable to neuropsychiatric symptoms and cortical brain parameters. We included as covariates: age, sex, education, and disease duration (for the PD group). Hazard ratios (HRs) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Results: When including both HC and PD in the model, Cox regression analyses showed that age of onset, diagnosis, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and sleep impairment are variables that are associated with a greater risk of conversion to MCI (p<.005). For HC, only the STAI and the genetic marker MAPT were significantly associated with a risk of cognitive decline (p<.05). These results further indicated that a greater anxiety score at the STAI leads to a greater chance of developing a MCI whereas being a carrier of the MAPT gene reduces the risk of MCI. Regarding analysis on PD, results revealed that the STAI and the cortical volumes of the frontal dorsolateral and temporal regions are involved with a greater risk of developing a MCI (p<.05). Conclusions: These analyses show that the neuropsychiatric symptom of anxiety seem to play an important role in the development of a MCI (significant in all three analyses). For patients with PD, cortical volumes of the frontal dorsolateral and temporal regions are significantly related to risk of MCI. This study highlights the importance of considering neuropsychiatric symptoms as well as cerebral volumes as key factors in the development of MCI in PD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".