MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390079876 · doi:10.32316/hse-rhe.2023.5235

Keith A. Mayes, The Unteachables: Disability Rights and the Invention of Black Special Education

2023· article· en· W4390079876 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Elaine Cagulada

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical Race Theory in Education
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpecial educationSociologyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

acknowledging that the presence of international students in Canadian schools may enrich learning about other cultures, she criticizes the explicit commodification and marketization of education that occurs when school districts are encouraged to compete for international students and the revenue that follows them, with the result that school districts will have unequal funding to support their schools.In chapter 4, Winton describes the implications of policies related to specialized programs and school choice as leading to some student obtaining private benefits from public education.She points to education policies that commodify education systems as illustrative of endogenous privatization.Winton reviews examples of alternative and specialized programs in public schools, such as International Baccalaureate and French immersion, pointing out that these programs tend to favour high achieving and other students from advantaged backgrounds.She then turns to schooling options of charter schools, private schools, and homeschooling.Her major objection to these options arises when public funding is provided for these options, which occurs in some provinces, as Winton claims that these private benefits lead to segregation and stratification in schools and society.In the final chapter, Winton offers ways to support public education, citing her commitment to critical democracy described in chapter 1. Suggested strategies include staying informed, asking critical questions, knowing what you are up against, and knowing that public education is worth fighting for.A major strength of this book is Winton's clear definition of privatization in contrast to the public school ideal.While a point of concern for some readers could be her sometimes unrealistic insistence on the public school ideal at the expense of variety and choice in public schooling, she insightfully points out the need for us all to be clear-eyed about the effects of privatization in education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.010
Scholarly communication0.0040.010
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducationSame topicCritical Race Theory in EducationFrench-language works237,207