Bibliographic record
Abstract
highlights the trajectory of lesser-known groups who also impacted on the cultural landscape, including Household Name and Another Colour.Despite the liberating ethos and societal shifts associated with of this era, traditional social structures often remained in place.Butt's account is granular in his documenting of this, exploring for example how the large intake from the nearby prestigious Sevenoaks Grammar School influenced the University environment.The Poly provided more access for working-class students and those with British immigrant parents, although Black and brown students still formed a tiny minority before the 1980s.Punk infected youth culture across the board, and Butt is careful to highlight working class punk and goth/post-punk bands without an art school connection.The student bands were accused of receiving disproportionate attention from the music press as the voice of Leeds, and Butt acknowledges these rifts and disparities, while arguing that punk bohemianism to some extent transcended reductionist binaries.This transcendence is something that was enabled through the overhang of welfarism that still existed into the 1980s, which facilitated both people receiving dole money, and poorer students with maintenance grants, to form bands. Butt provides a document of bands who created their own version of (post) punk, away from the London-based Svengalis who dominate the narrative.This is a story where the politics of gender, race, and sexuality are foregrounded.The book provides a fascinating insight into how the budding bands built on the collaborative approach championed in the art schools, forming overlapping groups of friends and enabling cross-cultural and social experimentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.037 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".