MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390083593 · doi:10.21037/jss-23-85

Patient-specific spinal rods in adult spinal deformity surgery reduce proximal junctional failure: a review of patient outcomes and surgical technique in a prospective observational cohort

2023· review· en· W4390083593 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Spine Surgery · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePelvic tiltKyphosisSurgeryOswestry Disability IndexSagittal planeProspective cohort studySpinal fusionVisual analogue scaleRadiographyRadiologyLow back pain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Spinal rods used for adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction are usually manufactured straight and bent manually during surgery. Pre-bent patient-specific spinal rods (PSSR) developed with software provide the surgeon with an intraoperative deformity correction consistent with the surgical plan. Our aim was to report clinical and radiological outcomes using PSSR. We investigated rates of junctional complications both proximally [kyphosis (PJK) and failure (PJF)] and distally [failure (DJF)]. Methods: Prospective case series of 20 consecutive patients who underwent ≥4 level ASD surgery with PSSR at a single institution between January 2019 and December 2022. Preoperative, 6-week, 6-month, 12-month, 24-month, and final follow-ups assessed patient satisfaction (Ottawa decision regret questionnaire) and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) [visual analogue scale (VAS; Back/Leg), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12)]. Sagittal spinopelvic parameters [sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), and pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL)] measured by serial EOS scans were performed preoperatively then compared to planned correction and postoperative measures. Interoperative cages (narrow/wide) were placed for interbody support. PJK risk score assessed likelihood of developing kyphosis. Serial computed tomography (CT) imaging assessed complication (fusion/subsidence). Results: The mean age of the patients (75% female) was 71.9±6.9 years, and the mean follow-up was 25.2±8.6 [7-40] months. Preoperative mean PROMs showed statistically significant overall improvement (P<0.001) postoperatively to final follow-up. Four patients without wide footprint cages at L4/5 or L5/S1, suffered DJF and reported regret undergoing surgery. Statistically significant difference (P<0.001) between preoperative and surgical plan in SVA and PI-LL but not in PT (P=0.058). No statistically significant difference in surgical plan versus the postoperative SVA, PI-LL, and PT (due to difficulty achieving the surgical plan, and also to maintaining the correction). One patient suffered PJF. There was a mean proximal kyphotic angle (PKA) of 17.8±13.0 degrees and PJK risk score of 3.7±1.0 with 40% who experienced PJK. No rod breakages were observed. Conclusions: In this series, PSSR improved PROMs and treated ASD. Sagittal parameters planned preoperatively correlated with postoperative correction. PJF was reduced, compared to the literature (35%), but PJK was observed over time. DJF occurred and was related to the absence of interbody cages at the lumbosacral junction and decisional regret.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it