Ecological and Real-Time Route Selection Method for Multiple Vehicles in Urban Road Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traffic congestion has been a hot topic of research in the field of intelligent transportation, which can be alleviated by efficient route navigation. Most of the existing route planning methods are non-negotiated algorithms, which do not take into account the route conflicts and collaborative relationships between multiple vehicles. Also, most negotiated algorithms have not been comprehensively considered dynamic route collaboration between vehicles, large-scale efficient computation, environmental pollution, etc. Therefore, an ecological multivehicle real-time route selection model (EMR2SM) for urban road networks is firstly proposed in this paper, which combines real-time traffic conditions of the road network with travel time, distance, and exhaust emissions as optimization indicators. In order to solve the large-scale computation problem of traditional negotiated algorithms, an adaptive multiswarm bee colony (AMSBC) algorithm is designed, which efficiently solves the multivehicle dynamic route selection problem. AMSBC searches the optimal route for each vehicle in parallel through multiple population division and self-adaption mechanism, to make multivehicle route selection reach Nash equilibrium. Compared with three non-negotiated optimization algorithms based on swarm technology, EMR2SM is verified by experiments that it improves the efficiency and accuracy of the optimal route selection for multiple vehicles and reduces vehicle emissions, which can effectively reduce traffic congestion and environmental pollution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".