Unsteady wake interference of unequal-height tandem cylinders mounted in a turbulent boundary layer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The unsteady wake interference of unequal-height tandem finite wall-mounted cylinders (FWMCs) fully submerged in a turbulent boundary layer (TBL) was investigated using time-resolved particle image velocimetry. The aspect ratios of the cylinders were fixed at $h/d = 5.3$ for the upstream cylinder (UC) and $H/d = 7.0$ for the downstream cylinder (DC) to achieve a height ratio of $h/H = 0.75$ , where d is the diameter of the cylinders. The Reynolds number based on the cylinder diameter was $Re = 5540$ and the submergence ratio was $\delta /H = 1.2$ , where $\delta $ is the TBL thickness. Three main flow regimes of tandem FWMCs were examined by varying the centre-to-centre spacing ( $s$ ) between the cylinders: extended-body ( $s/d = 2$ ), reattachment ( $s/d = 4$ ) and co-shedding ( $s/d = 6$ ) regimes. These test cases denoted as SR2, SR4 and SR6, respectively, were compared with a reference isolated cylinder (SC) with an aspect ratio similar to that of the DC. Spatio-temporal analysis of the flow field showed that the gap region of SR2 is characterized by a strong downwash of alternating low- and high-momentum fluid induced by the approach flow that is deflected from the unsheltered portion of the DC. In contrast, the gap region of SR4 and SR6 exhibited both downwash and upwash flow with a saddle point that moves closer to the mid-height of the UC as the spacing ratio increases. The upwash and downwash shear layers were associated with small-scale vortices with Strouhal numbers larger than that of the Kármán vortex shedding in the spanwise shear layers. The wake structure behind the DC was significantly altered compared with the SC due to sheltering effects, and the spacing ratio had a significant impact on the spatio-temporal evolution of the vortices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".