MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390118073 · doi:10.5114/jos.2023.133642

Minimal invasive crestal sinus technique using autologous fibrin glue versus sticky bone with simultaneous implant insertion: a prospective study

2023· article· en· W4390118073 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nourhan Tarek Abdelhamid, Mohamed Zaghlool Amer, Hamdy Marzouk, Sally Abdelsameaa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Stomatology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibrin glueMedicineSinus (botany)DentistryImplantProspective cohort studyFibrin Tissue AdhesiveFibrinDental implantSurgeryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Following tooth extraction, posterior maxilla frequently experiences bone resorption and maxil lary sinus pneumatization, resulting in resorption of bone with insufficient dimension for adequate dental implants placement.Objectives: This clinical investigation was performed to assess implant stability and radiographic outcomes us ing autologous fibrin glue (AFG) against sticky bone combined with crestal sinus lift procedure and simultaneous implant insertion. Material and methods:The study involved 12 implants in ten patients with residual bone height from 5 to 9 mm, divided into two groups.In group A, AFG was applied for maxillary sinus augmentation, while in group B, sticky bone was used for maxillary sinus augmentation.All patients were followedup clinically to evaluate im plant stability at baseline (T 0 ), third month (T 3 ), and ninth month (T 9 ) as well as radiographically to evaluate residual bone height, implant protrusion, graft apical height, and graft sinus height at same time intervals.Data were analyzed using (IBM SPSS software, version 26.0).Pvalue ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: A total of 10 patients (8 females, 2 males) participated in the study, with mean age ± SD of 29.83 ± 3.54 years in group A, and mean age ± SD of 32 ± 3.89 years in group B. At T 0 , T 3 , and T 9 followup, there was a statistical significance within each group (with p < 0.001 in all studied parameters).However, there were no sig nificant differences between both groups, with p = 0.843, 0.296, and 0.451 regarding implant stability, p = 0.221, 0.244, and 0.276 in graft apical height, and p = 0.435, 0.494, and 0.673 regarding graft sinus height, respectively.Conclusions: AFG can be applied as a noninferior material during sinus lifting with advantages including fewer complications, easy preparation procedure, less timeconsuming, and affordable cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Stomatology→Same topicDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→