CNS Inflammation as the First Sign of Complement Factor I Deficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Complement factor I (CFI) deficiency is a rare autosomal recessive inborn error of immunity. In this report, we highlight that complete CFI deficiency may present with isolated and severe CNS inflammation without associated systemic features nor prior non-CNS episodes. This inflammation may respond to complement blockade therapy. METHODS: This is a case description of a young girl with severe longitudinal transverse myelitis treated with aggressive immunotherapy that included eculizumab. Published cases of CFI-associated CNS inflammation were reviewed and discussed. RESULTS: A primary immunodeficiency panel revealed 2 germline pathogenic variants in the CFI gene. Further complement testing of the index case and her family confirmed complete CFI deficiency. DISCUSSION: We describe a unique case of severe spinal inflammation secondary to complete CFI deficiency. Although rare, isolated CNS inflammation may be the primary manifestation of complete CFI deficiency. To halt the uncontrolled complement-mediated inflammation associated with CFI deficiency, prompt targeted blockade of the complement pathway using eculizumab may be life changing in the acute phase. Long-lasting blockade of the complement pathway is also essential to prevent relapse in this subgroup of patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".