MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La flora briofítica del Parque Natural del Cadí-Moixeró (Pirineos Orientales, Cataluña, España)

2023· article· es· W4390142750 on OpenAlexaff
Elena Ruiz, Pere Aymerich, Llorenç Sáez, Montserrat Brugués

Bibliographic record

VenueBoletín de la Sociedad Española de Briología · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsSpinal Cord Injury BC
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBryophyteNatural parkHerbariumFlora (microbiology)GeographyHumanitiesFloristicsForestryEcologyBiologyTaxonArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a comprehensive catalogue of the bryophyte flora of the Cadí-Moixeró Natural Park, based mainly on the collection campaigns conducted between 2016 and 2022. During this period, 1,118 bryophyte samples were collected in the 53 localities surveyed. The resulting bryophyte list is supplemented by previous literature reports and unpublished herbarium specimens from the Natural Park. The catalogue includes a total of 293 taxa, of which 48 are liverworts and 245 are mosses. Additionally, species of chorological and conservation interest in the macrohabitats studied are discussed. En este trabajo se presenta un catálogo completo de la flora briofítica del Parque Natural del Cadí-Moixeró, basado en gran parte en las campañas de recolección realizadas entre 2016 y 2022. Durante estos años se recolectaron 1.118 muestras de briófitos en las 53 localidades prospectadas. La lista de briófitos resultado de dicho estudio se completa con citas bibliográficas previas y especímenes de herbario inéditos recolectados en el parque natural, en total incluye 293 táxones, de los cuales 48 son hepáticas y 245 musgos. Se comentan las especies de interés corológico y de conservación en los macrohábitats estudiados.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBoletín de la Sociedad Española de BriologíaSame topicBryophyte Studies and RecordsFrench-language works237,207