La flora briofítica del Parque Natural del Cadí-Moixeró (Pirineos Orientales, Cataluña, España)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work presents a comprehensive catalogue of the bryophyte flora of the Cadí-Moixeró Natural Park, based mainly on the collection campaigns conducted between 2016 and 2022. During this period, 1,118 bryophyte samples were collected in the 53 localities surveyed. The resulting bryophyte list is supplemented by previous literature reports and unpublished herbarium specimens from the Natural Park. The catalogue includes a total of 293 taxa, of which 48 are liverworts and 245 are mosses. Additionally, species of chorological and conservation interest in the macrohabitats studied are discussed. En este trabajo se presenta un catálogo completo de la flora briofítica del Parque Natural del Cadí-Moixeró, basado en gran parte en las campañas de recolección realizadas entre 2016 y 2022. Durante estos años se recolectaron 1.118 muestras de briófitos en las 53 localidades prospectadas. La lista de briófitos resultado de dicho estudio se completa con citas bibliográficas previas y especímenes de herbario inéditos recolectados en el parque natural, en total incluye 293 táxones, de los cuales 48 son hepáticas y 245 musgos. Se comentan las especies de interés corológico y de conservación en los macrohábitats estudiados.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".