MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390170519 · doi:10.23977/cpcs.2023.070114

Research on the Development of Convoy Mobile App

2023· article· en· W4390170519 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Renmao Zhao, Yang Tiantian

Bibliographic record

VenueComputing Performance and Communication systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicE-commerce and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaceTRIPS architectureComputer scienceGlobal Positioning SystemLocation-based serviceGSMTelecommunicationsTerminal (telecommunication)Wireless networkMobile technologyMobile computingWorld Wide WebWirelessGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the progress of society and technology and the acceleration of people's life rhythm, nowadays, location-based services play an indispensable role in people's lives. For mobile users using mobile devices such as smartphones, location-based services are an integral part of life. Location-based services usually obtain the location information (geographic coordinates, or geographic coordinates) of mobile terminal users through the wireless communication network (such as GSM network, CDMA network) or external positioning (such as GPS) of mobile telecommunication operators. The accelerated pace of life also means more and more trips and transportation. In many cases, people would like to meet friends or family at a particular place. At the same time, they hope to observe each other's location and route during the journey and even hope to be able to chat by text or voice when they go to their destination together. The purpose of this project is to develop a map application program, which allows users to share real-time location, communication, and chats with friends or family members. Besides, if the user establishes a meeting place with friends, the application can make routes for the "travel together" people respectively, and the user can see the routes of friends on the map. This project collects useful insights and design ideas, and refers to and studies related applications to help the development of products in this project. In the future, more in-depth research can also be carried out to improve based on this project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.006
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputing Performance and Communication systemsSame topicE-commerce and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207