MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4390192895 · doi:10.1002/alz.074234

Impact of mobile research unit in SKYLINE trial to broaden trial access in traditionally underrepresented communities

2023· article· en· W4390192895 on OpenAlexaff
Ruth Croney, Adam Jan, Vicki Hurley, Kelly Markham‐Coultes, J. Stanley Smith, D Batchuluun, Lucia Jaime, Lucie Fils‐Aime, Astrid Pingshaw, Susanne Ostrowitzki

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMental Health and Patient Involvement
Canadian institutionsRoche (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutreachUnit (ring theory)OperationalizationSkylineMedicineGerontologyEthnic groupMedical educationPsychologyFamily medicineGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The SKYLINE prevention trial (NCT05256134) aimed to enroll cognitively unimpaired, elderly, amyloid‐positive adults, which is known to be challenging. Additionally, it is essential to address disparities of access to trials, particularly in underrepresented populations (URPs) where the need to travel to a research site and lack of comfort or distrust of medical providers have been identified as barriers to participation (Alzheimers Dement 2021;17:327‐406). Potential participants in URPs may have limited experience/knowledge of clinical research; therefore, additional community‐based initiatives were launched to improve awareness and education. Method A mobile research unit (THOR) was designed to visit selected communities and provide education on memory loss and initial access to screening for the SKYLINE trial. THOR was designed to optimize participant experience and study visit flow (Figure), and was strategically operationalized in Florida due to the large prevalence of older adults, high proportions of URPs, and concentration of Alzheimer’s research centers. Two multilingual personnel, representative of the targeted populations and with expertise in outreach within URPs, managed the unit. Community‐based settings were targeted, including community centers, churches, retirement communities, restaurants, and doctors’ offices. In addition to SKYLINE prescreening, THOR offered community‐based memory screenings and memory loss education to help build relationships and trust with communities. A survey was used to assess site staff perceptions of the implementation of THOR. Result Between July and November 2022, THOR was deployed at 20 community outreach events; 325 participants were prescreened for SKYLINE (Table 1). Race and ethnicity data were provided by 127 participants at 12 events from Global Alzheimer’s Platform (GAP) Foundation‐partnered sites; 64/127 (50.4%) participants were from an URP. Overall, 80% of surveyed site staff agreed/strongly agreed that THOR had a positive impact on relationship‐building and prescreening rates in URPs (Table 2). Conclusion THOR was an innovative, strategic way to increase access to SKYLINE by raising awareness of brain health and clinical research in the community. Site survey responses indicated utilization of THOR improved engagement with URPs. Implementation of a mobile research unit with capabilities to perform trial prescreening activities was an effective way to engage potential trial participants including URPs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.029
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0290.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.707
GPT teacher head0.605
Teacher spread0.102 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicMental Health and Patient Involvement→French-language works237,207→